I should probably start this post with a bit of a disclaimer because, although all of my posts are obviously written from my personal perspective, they are usually written about specific information I have obtained or learned which I feel may be of interest or which I feel should be brought to the public’s attention. This post is my personal opinion – my own rant, if you will – regarding the changes which I feel need to occur before any real improvements can be made in our district and in public schools throughout the country.
I recently complained to a School Committee member that serious changes need to take place in our schools, starting with the union contracts, and he responded “. . . you have to start going after the MTA state-wide and other teachers’ unions across the country. No one is going to listen to you at the local level to effect the change that should take place. You need a bigger audience.”
This was an interesting response from an elected official elected to “listen to [voters] at the local level to effect the change that should take place“. Starting at the local level is the only place we have any control.
Everyone is afraid to rattle the MTA’s cage! There is momentum in this country right now to make changes to the way our public schools are being run and the way that teachers’ unions have held our schools hostage for the better part of the last forty years. Our schools are failing to keep up with the world’s standards. We are failing our children. And our towns and cities cannot sustain the unreasonable contracts into which the schools continue to enter with the unions.
I contend that “No Child Left Behind” was a great concept which failed horribly in actuality. I believe that it has succeeded only in homogenizing the performance of all of our children. We have come to see our schools as “successful” if they meet the standard of beige mediocrity. Rather than providing the necessary attention to assist those students who struggle to progress and meet minimal standards – we have sacrificed the students who have the potential to lead, achieve greatness and exceed all standards. We have tied the anchors of the under-achieving students to the kite tails of the students who have the potential to excel. The resources of our schools are slanted towards the under-achieving students and, as a result, parents are removing the children who excel and placing them in environments which have proven records of excellence.
There is a reason that so many charter schools are achieving more success than many of our public schools. The concept – and this is just crazy, I know – is that if they don’t perform adequately, their charter is revoked. So they function to perform with excellence. They are not unionized and, as such, their teachers are also motivated to excel. And guess what? I’ve never heard one report that any teacher of a charter school was required to work in sweat shop conditions! That’s because there are labor laws that adequately apply and protect ALL employees in our country.
Tenure – or “professional status,” as it is called here/now – is a concept which has long since outlived its usefulness. It serves no purpose beyond protecting under-performing, ineffective teachers.
It is blatantly clear and obvious to every single person in this country who functions professionally outside of a union – as a civilian, if you will – that the solution to where we have run our schools off in the ditch could not possibly be more simple: merit-based schools, merit-based pay for employees who compete for positions, obtain positions and maintain positions based on performance.
It really is that simple. Give teachers a reason to be motivated, a reason to inspire their students, a reason to work harder than the next guy – and we will find that we have schools capable of achieving excellence.
In other words, hold teachers and administrators accountable for the jobs they were hired to perform.
It isn’t rocket science. In fact, if it were, we wouldn’t be in the sad situation we are in with our public schools, because we expect our rockets to actually take off and fly. And we wouldn’t dream of hiring and keeping rocket scientists who no longer have the drive, desire or ability to get the rockets off the ground. And we certainly would not, under any circumstances, give them “step increases” each year just because another year has passed – even though the rocket they built fell out of the sky and killed the astronauts inside!