As the citizens of Dennis and Yarmouth face yet another vote on yet another requested budget override for the school district, we will undoubtedly begin to be barraged with the same rhetoric from the school administration and its supporters that the request is being made in the name of the “children”. We will be implored to make an investment in “education for the children” and we will be told that to vote for “budget cuts” is unreasonable and short-sighted.
Never mind that there are no budget cuts. Forget that the district receives an increase to its funding every year. Ignore that this district has a higher per pupil expenditure than the state average and much higher than the national average.
And if we are expected to believe that throwing more money at the district will improve education for our children, then one would think that our significantly smaller than average class sizes and higher than average per pupil expenditure should result in measurable improvements.
Yet the district’s graduation rates, drop-out rates and absentee/attendance rates are all worse than the state averages. Our MCAS scores have only improved minimally and are still lower than the surrounding districts.
Over the past ten years enrollment has dropped by 25%. In that same period of time, the teacher headcount has risen. Every year when the administration makes a budget (based on the increased funding provided by the taxpayers), they cut programs for the kids and make only token cuts to teachers and/or other staff.
Really? And the override is “for the children”?
How is it possible to have less children each year, more money in the budget and the administration cuts programs for the kids? One look at the Town Budget and the salaries of the school employees will show you that many of the teachers and most of the administrators make more than the average household income for families in Dennis and Yarmouth. The average teacher’s salary in this district is higher than the state average as well.
The voters in Dennis and Yarmouth are not ignorant, short-sighted, unreasonable, irrational, delusional or irresponsible. They have sent a loud and clear message to the district each year at the polls and the district chooses to ignore it. The budget that is published for public consumption is vague and ambiguous to the point of being outright deceptive. There is no accountability nor transparency on the part of this administration.
If the School Committee is not willing or able to respond to the obvious demands of the voters by simply operating the school district within the budget provided by the taxpayers — funds which INCREASE every year while enrollment decreases — then the voters must elect public officials who will do so.
Just because an “educator” says that it is all about the children does not make it so. The finances of this district are skewed, manipulated and unbalanced in favor of the individuals who are earning the funds put into it – and the measurable performance indicators evidence that this is NOT for the children.